I don't see any on topic...sgt schultz wrote:NS8401 wrote:Always glad to provide folks like you an education... it's the least I can do.sgt schultz wrote:Yes, we all know that. Thanks for the clarification.
As mentioned, we all know that, including myself, even before you so eloquently pointed it out. I should have rephrased so as to not get you all upset. And nice going, 8401, what, 5, six, posts in this thread, and yet, not a single one on topic.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
LOVE THE JUDGE
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Oh, and Schultz, your summary of Hamliton's actions are an opinion not a fact. You can also google the meaning of both words, as we all understand how confusing the two concepts can be to Fox Channel viewers.NS8401 wrote:Always glad to provide folks like you an education... it's the least I can do.sgt schultz wrote:Yes, we all know that. Thanks for the clarification.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
- sgt schultz
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:17 am
- Location: here, there & everywhere
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Google what grasshopper?sgt schultz wrote:Google this, sore loser.
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Sorry if your lack of grasp of concepts like fact and opinion cause so much strife for you. Calling assholes like Pence various things and booing him is going to be a big part of the future, as they lost the popular vote AND this will be regarded as the worst Presidency in our history. Republicans and Democrats alike acknowledge we are headed for big trouble.sgt schultz wrote:Google this, sore loser.
If you can't handle this reality or a grasp of the constitution then maybe you should head back to the shallow end of the pool and not engage in conversations above your ability.
this[th is]pronoun, plural these[th eez] (Show IPA)1.(used to indicate a person, thing, idea, state, event, time, remark, etc., as present, near, just mentioned or pointed out, supposed to be understood, or by way of emphasis):This is my coat.2.(used to indicate one of two or more persons, things, etc., referring to the one nearer in place, time, or thought; opposed to that):This is Liza and that is Amy.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
- sgt schultz
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:17 am
- Location: here, there & everywhere
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
TC, you really should consider professional help to resolve your anger issues. So how'd you like the video? The Judge, ain't she great!!
an open mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
I must say, it was quite an enjoyable election, don't you think?TC Talks wrote:Sorry if your lack of grasp of concepts like fact and opinion cause so much strife for you. Calling assholes like Pence various things and booing him is going to be a big part of the future, as they lost the popular vote AND this will be regarded as the worst Presidency in our history. Republicans and Democrats alike acknowledge we are headed for big trouble.sgt schultz wrote:Google this, sore loser.
If you can't handle this reality or a grasp of the constitution then maybe you should head back to the shallow end of the pool and not engage in conversations above your ability.
this[th is]pronoun, plural these[th eez] (Show IPA)1.(used to indicate a person, thing, idea, state, event, time, remark, etc., as present, near, just mentioned or pointed out, supposed to be understood, or by way of emphasis):This is my coat.2.(used to indicate one of two or more persons, things, etc., referring to the one nearer in place, time, or thought; opposed to that):This is Liza and that is Amy.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
For entertainment value and the incredible nature of it really was second to none no matter your side...Matt wrote:I must say, it was quite an enjoyable election, don't you think?TC Talks wrote:Sorry if your lack of grasp of concepts like fact and opinion cause so much strife for you. Calling assholes like Pence various things and booing him is going to be a big part of the future, as they lost the popular vote AND this will be regarded as the worst Presidency in our history. Republicans and Democrats alike acknowledge we are headed for big trouble.sgt schultz wrote:Google this, sore loser.
If you can't handle this reality or a grasp of the constitution then maybe you should head back to the shallow end of the pool and not engage in conversations above your ability.
this[th is]pronoun, plural these[th eez] (Show IPA)1.(used to indicate a person, thing, idea, state, event, time, remark, etc., as present, near, just mentioned or pointed out, supposed to be understood, or by way of emphasis):This is my coat.2.(used to indicate one of two or more persons, things, etc., referring to the one nearer in place, time, or thought; opposed to that):This is Liza and that is Amy.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
I think it was interesting he got you to vote for him.
I didn't vote for Trump or Clinton,
![Embarassed :red](./images/smilies/embarassed.gif)
I didn't vote for Trump or Clinton,
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
And I'll always respect you for this...
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Merci beaucoup monsieur.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
How do you figure? He won 306-232. Removing Texas from the union would put him at 268-232 which would send it to the House of Representatives, which, I'm pretty sure republicans would still control even without Texas reps, so Trump would still win.NS8401 wrote:Take Texas out and he loses fair and square... what's your point?
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Interesting that a sore loser dem would suggest removing Texas but not California...bmw wrote:How do you figure? He won 306-232. Removing Texas from the union would put him at 268-232 which would send it to the House of Representatives, which, I'm pretty sure republicans would still control even without Texas reps, so Trump would still win.NS8401 wrote:Take Texas out and he loses fair and square... what's your point?
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Switch Texas to Clinton and she wins... I assumed we were switching California to Trump so I offered an alternative that assumes California didn't switch. I know he didn't switch Texas for me in his.bmw wrote:How do you figure? He won 306-232. Removing Texas from the union would put him at 268-232 which would send it to the House of Representatives, which, I'm pretty sure republicans would still control even without Texas reps, so Trump would still win.NS8401 wrote:Take Texas out and he loses fair and square... what's your point?
Re: LOVE THE JUDGE
Or give each state and DC one vote and Trump wins in a bigger landslide, where his support goes up to 59% (30/51) from 57% (306/538).NS8401 wrote:Switch Texas to Clinton and she wins... I assumed we were switching California to Trump so I offered an alternative that assumes California didn't switch. I know he didn't switch Texas for me in his.bmw wrote:How do you figure? He won 306-232. Removing Texas from the union would put him at 268-232 which would send it to the House of Representatives, which, I'm pretty sure republicans would still control even without Texas reps, so Trump would still win.NS8401 wrote:Take Texas out and he loses fair and square... what's your point?
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.