Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

No Indictment For Hillary...

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: No Indictment For Hillary...

Post by Bryce » Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:26 pm

NS8401 wrote:Some of you guys were so sure one was coming (Bryce I'm looking at you) but in a statement only the FBI knew the contents of, Director James Comey announced that no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges in a case like this despite some minor statute violations. That's a major blow to your hopes...
Just because she wasn't indicted doesn't mean she couldn't have or shouldn't have been. The fat lady hasn't sang on this yet. It ain't over, till it's over.

At Comey's presser, if you read between the lines, he basically said that she did break the law but none of the prosecutors that work for his boss would bring charges. He even went on to warn others that if they do the same thing they would and could face charges.

If you don't think that Lynch knew what he was going to say when she said she would follow his recommendation, (as well as Obama when he agreed to do a campaign stop with HilLIEry) I have some lake front property in Hamtramck to sell ya.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Deleted User 8570

Re: No Indictment For Hillary...

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:31 pm

Bryce wrote:
NS8401 wrote:Some of you guys were so sure one was coming (Bryce I'm looking at you) but in a statement only the FBI knew the contents of, Director James Comey announced that no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges in a case like this despite some minor statute violations. That's a major blow to your hopes...
Just because she wasn't indicted doesn't mean she couldn't have or shouldn't have been. The fat lady hasn't sang on this yet. It ain't over, till it's over.

At Comey's presser, if you read between the lines, he basically said that she did break the law but none of the prosecutors that work for his boss would bring charges. He even went on to warn others that if they do the same thing they would and could face charges.

If you don't think that Lynch knew what he was going to say when she said she would follow his recommendation, (as well as Obama when he agreed to do a campaign stop with HilLIEry) I have some lake front property in Hamtramck to sell ya.
So if these were Conservatives protecting Cruz or something they wouldn't do exactly the same thing you are accusing the current folks of doing to "protect" their candidate? I've got lakefront property in the Sahara to sell you if you think your side would behave any differently.

The case has been reopened in some way now...

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: No Indictment For Hillary...

Post by Bryce » Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:12 pm

NS8401 wrote: So if these were Conservatives protecting Cruz or something they wouldn't do exactly the same thing you are accusing the current folks of doing to "protect" their candidate? I've got lakefront property in the Sahara to sell you if you think your side would behave any differently.
.
I have no information or proof that that is the case. Do you?
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Deleted User 8570

Re: No Indictment For Hillary...

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Thu Jul 07, 2016 11:45 pm

Bryce wrote:
NS8401 wrote: So if these were Conservatives protecting Cruz or something they wouldn't do exactly the same thing you are accusing the current folks of doing to "protect" their candidate? I've got lakefront property in the Sahara to sell you if you think your side would behave any differently.
.
I have no information or proof that that is the case. Do you?
No I'm saying if the roles were reversed and a Republican Attorney General and FBI Director had found nothing to charge a Republican with in the exact same situation would you be equally outraged? It's a hypothetical so no need to avoid the question by pretending I'm giving you a real story...

bmw
Posts: 6973
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: No Indictment For Hillary...

Post by bmw » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:19 pm

I had fun putting this video together. This was TOO EASY!


Post Reply Previous topicNext topic