Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 6 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
What about Marine Frequencies? VHF, high power, no special license.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
AGAIN the problem with VHF marine band is that "radio horizon", you need a high tower and gain antenna and still may not be able to reach 60 miles.
VHF marine radios are FM and only up to 25 W , FM is a very poor mode for weak signal work.
VHF marine radios are FM and only up to 25 W , FM is a very poor mode for weak signal work.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
I don't think it's the power as much as the radio horizon issue. Marine VHF is good for ~40 miles but that's usually limited by antenna height. That height would have to increase even further to get above the terrain obstructions that you'd have that boats don't need to deal with.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12176
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
What's wrong with the 6 meters band (50 MHz to 54 MHz) ?
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
6 meters is still VHF, and thus, requires higher power and/or a higher antenna.
As a general rule, is there a linear relationship between broadcast distance and frequency, all other things equal? As in, will the same power signal on the same antenna type (say, quarter-length dipole) travel further (groundwave) for every step down in frequency?
NVIS propagation looks interesting. But it also looks like 40 meters is the highest frequency band you can reliable use such propagation on.
As a general rule, is there a linear relationship between broadcast distance and frequency, all other things equal? As in, will the same power signal on the same antenna type (say, quarter-length dipole) travel further (groundwave) for every step down in frequency?
NVIS propagation looks interesting. But it also looks like 40 meters is the highest frequency band you can reliable use such propagation on.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8605
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
80 meters is probably the band. I talk on it almost every day and 60-150 miles is no sweat with 100 watts and full-size dipole antenna in NVIS mode.
Get a ham license though, you can practice at www.qrz.com with the actual questions on the test.
Get a ham license though, you can practice at www.qrz.com with the actual questions on the test.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- audiophile
- Posts: 8605
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
Also the CB band could work but you will need beams and to run a SSB radio. Same with six meters.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- audiophile
- Posts: 8605
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
bmw wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:21 pm6 meters is still VHF, and thus, requires higher power and/or a higher antenna.
*CORRECT, AND PROBABLY A BEAM TOO.
As a general rule, is there a linear relationship between broadcast distance and frequency, all other things equal? As in, will the same power signal on the same antenna type (say, quarter-length dipole) travel further (groundwave) for every step down in frequency?
*NOT THAT SIMPLE. GROUND WAVE IS EXCELLENT ON LOWER END OF AM BROADCAST BANDS (540 kHz). BY THE TIME YOU GET TO UPPER END OF AM BROADCAST BAND IT'S TERRIBLE IN MANY LOCATIONS (1600 kHz) DEPENDING ON TYPE OF SOIL. ONCE YOU GET TO 80/75 METERS (3800 to 4000 kHz) GROUND WAVE ISN'T VERY HELPFUL BEYOND A FEW MILES! THERE IS A SOMEWHAT OF A DEAD ZONE, WHERE GROUND WAVE DIES OUT AND NVIS HASN'T FULLY KICKED IN YET.
NVIS propagation looks interesting. But it also looks like 40 meters is the highest frequency band you can reliable use such propagation on.
*YES, I WOULD RECOMMEND 80/75 METERS FOR NVIS. THERE WEBSITES THAT SHOW MAXIMUM USABLE FREQUENCY FOR NVIS. http://www.spacew.com/www/fof2.html
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
My high school neighbor at WB8APT, "WB8 Another Powerful Transmitter, running 10 watts QRP", built a low power transmitter, and put a decent ground wave 8 blocks away on 40 meters with a Magnavox AM/SW Portable.
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?
Same (x, y, z), different (t)
Your bullet missed my trial balloon.
RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.
Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
Same (x, y, z), different (t)
Your bullet missed my trial balloon.
RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.
Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
Unless you're connected to a dummy load, ten watts on any HF or VHF band will get you out further than 8 blocks (1/2 mile or so), but not 60 miles ground wave, nor on sky wave, predictably or reliably. And, it's always all about the antenna.
To nit-pick, 5 watts and under is what's commonly regarded as "QRP."
MW- 6 meters can behave similarly to 10m, with spring/summer sporadic-E welcomed by DXers, a problem for local comms, and short local direct range.
Re: Best setup for reliable radio communications over 30 or 60 miles?
He was the one who said 10 watts QRP, not me. This was circa 1969, so I don't know when the 5 watt designation happened. 5 watts? That's what Dale Bickel gave the 106.7 translator for an STA in Petoskey. I guess it's a QRP STA.
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?
Same (x, y, z), different (t)
Your bullet missed my trial balloon.
RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.
Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
Same (x, y, z), different (t)
Your bullet missed my trial balloon.
RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.
Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.