Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

The technical side of broadcasting. Think IBOC is a sham? Talk about it here! How about HDTV? Post DX reports here as well.
Deleted User 3751

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by Deleted User 3751 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:09 am

Could it be due to later sunrises and earlier sunsets? Perhaps you lose the HD portion of WWJ's signal when Montréal's 940 (also 50kW) signal comes in by nighttime skywave?
The HD drop outs that I'm talking about happen in the middle of the day. I've noticed this in two different vehicles with HD. I began to notice it in Early September.



CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems?

Post by CK-722 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:25 am

innate-in-you wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:43 pm
Some of these steroid-era regionals are getting out, as some 50kW clears at the top of the band have been doing all along.

KZQZ (1430, St. Louis, MO). is 50kW. About one day in four, I listen to them on my way home, as they are one of last Oldies stations left.


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems?

Post by CK-722 » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:30 am

innate-in-you wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:43 pm
Some of these steroid-era regionals are getting out, as some 50kW clears at the top of the band have been doing all along.

KZQZ (1430, St. Louis, MO). is 50kW. About one day in four, I listen to them on my way home, as they are one of last Oldies stations left.
There's another factor. Canadian stations have been abandoning the AM band in droves. In areas near the border, this opens up nearby stations even with lower power to be heard even in middays around the Winter Solstice.


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

bmw
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by bmw » Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:30 pm

While they still have the digital noisemaker turned on, I've noticed a significant improvement in WWJ's audio quality (analog). They've backed off quite a bit on the audio compression and the weird distortion I've noticed for years in their audio seems to be mostly, if not completely gone. They're actually one of the quieter signals on the AM dial now (and I'm still receiving plenty of signal strength).



CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by CK-722 » Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:16 pm

I noticed a lot of fading tonight in Macomb County around Sunset.

bmw, when you say the signal is good, is this up near Tawas City, and Day or Night or both? Actually, as you probably know, WWJ and other 50 kW stations from the Detroit Area are among the strongest ground waves and skywaves in that area.

If you put in 48763, you'll see this. 10% Skywave for WWJ and others would probably be close to 3-4 mV due to the higher angle of departure that reflects to Tawas City, somewhat less than the Straits Area with lower angles of departure.

https://www.v-soft.com/on-line-based-software/zipsignal


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

Rich F.
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 5:53 am
Location: Illinois USA
Contact:

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by Rich F. » Sat Jan 18, 2020 5:01 am

CK-722 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:16 pm
... is this up near Tawas City, and Day or Night or both? Actually, as you probably know, WWJ and other 50 kW stations from the Detroit Area are among the strongest ground waves and skywaves in that area ...
According to the FCC engineering data for WWJ and WJR shown in the graphic below, the 50% nighttime skywave field of WWJ near Tawas City is about 3.6 mV/m, and for WJR is about 0.7 mV/m. This difference is the result of the much higher radiated power from WWJ at all elevation angles from the gain of their directional array on the bearing toward Tawas City.

It is interesting to compare the groundwave fields of WWJ and WJR near Tawas City. Even though the ~7800 mV/m, h-plane field of WWJ on that bearing and ~1 km from their array exceeds the 2845 mV/m field of WJR by some 2.7X, the groundwave of WWJ and WJR in/near Tawas City are substantially equal.

This near equality of their groundwaves is the result of the greater propagation loss on 950 kHz vs 760 kHz, together with the slightly shorter path length of WJR to Tawas City than that of WWJ.

The daytime groundwave of WWJ near Tawas City drops to 498 µV/m due their different daytime pattern. This is a little less than the 524 µV/m field for the daytime groundwave there of WJR, but the two are still substantially equal.

Image



CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by CK-722 » Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:46 am

Thanks Rich.

The inverse field at that elevation angle for WJR is considerably reduced at that distance. The WWJ array has a broadside East West arrangement, which causes the field to decrease less with elevation angle compared to the 195 degree WJR radiator, or a classic three or four tower in line or near in line endfire array. The power has to go somewhere, and a broadside array has a narrower horizontal main lobe and more goes above the horizon where more is reflected. A typical endfire array concentrates the signal more into the horizontal like a taller tower.


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

bmw
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by bmw » Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:50 am

Sorry Rich, I'm going to have to disagree with those theoretical numbers. From my actual listening experience, both day and night, WWJ is considerably stronger than WJR in the Tawas and Oscoda area, and has been so for as far back as I can remember. That's not to say that WJR doesn't have a decent signal, but WWJ is the strongest signal on the dial after 1480 WIOS. I would say that WJR's signal strength is more on par with that of WSGW AM 790 than with 950.

This is non-scientific, but off the top of my head, I would rate, on a scale of 1 to 10, the strongest signals on the AM dial here (daytime groudnwave) as follows:

#1 - AM 1480 WIOS - 10.0
#2 - AM 950 WWJ - 8.0
#3 - AM 660 WMIC - 7.0
#4 - AM 790 WSGW - 6.5
#5 - AM 760 WJR - 6.0



CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by CK-722 » Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:06 pm

Daytime skywave this time of year may be another factor. I've noticed that it rarely affects stations below 900. And WFDF seems to be on their 10 kW back up transmitter a lot. They should have built a building that would have space to hold an old 50 kW transmitter. The old building in Burton had a lot more room.

Edited Daytime list omitting Night facilities and phantom Canadian stations.

843.1 WIOS TAWAS CITY-EAST TAW MI 1480 31477
1.27 WMIC SANDUSKY MI 660 59026
0.66 WFDF FARMINGTON HILLS MI 910 13664
0.66 WJMK BRIDGEPORT MI 1250 4600
0.59 WLEW BAD AXE MI 1340 67045
0.58 WMAX BAY CITY MI 1440 58576
0.57 WJR DETROIT MI 760 8626
0.55 WSGW SAGINAW MI 790 22674
0.53 CKLW WINDSOR ON 800 98868
0.52 WWJ DETROIT MI 950 9621
0.49 WTCM TRAVERSE CITY MI 580 70524
0.42 WSNL FLINT MI 600 42078
0.35 WHAK ROGERS CITY MI 960 2928

Based on data measured for WTCM, WCCW (WOOD and WHGR), and WWJ (WHAK), I'd say that WTCM and WHAK are considerably less than predicted. The rest crossing Downriver, The Thumb, and Lake Huron are probably fairly close.


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

User avatar
SolarMax
Posts: 702
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 5:59 pm
Location: 313

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by SolarMax » Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:47 pm

bmw wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:30 pm
While they still have the digital noisemaker turned on, I've noticed a significant improvement in WWJ's audio quality (analog). They've backed off quite a bit on the audio compression and the weird distortion I've noticed for years in their audio seems to be mostly, if not completely gone. They're actually one of the quieter signals on the AM dial now (and I'm still receiving plenty of signal strength).
The other night, late, I was listening to WWJ with earbuds. Right up close in my ears, the audio quality, at least that of the studio anchor, was simply awful. Sounded like one of those old fuzzy ISDN feeds, while much of their other audio material sounded considerably better, even the AccuWeather guy, as well as most spots and sweepers. I did tune around to make sure it wasn't just my Sony running low on battery. WLS, WCBS, others, sounded pretty clean in comparison.



CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by CK-722 » Sun Jan 19, 2020 3:06 am

Except for the Canadian stations that moved to FM or another frequency, and stations that moved or otherwise upgraded, these are the same signals you always heard in Harrisville. The surprising one was WJBK/WDEE/WLQV 1500. I remember some people on the beach had that weird shaped radio that came in several colors and were listening to CKLW. Somebody drove into the State Park with WTAC (now WSNL) 600 blaring in in their pickup truck. You could get WTRX 1330 there also with a good radio. WLEW 1340 was a perennial. CKNX 920 Wingham also came in quite well.


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 11870
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by MWmetalhead » Sun Jan 19, 2020 11:31 am

BMW,
I'm curious to know where 630 CFCO, 910 WFDF, and 800 CKLW would chart on your 1 - 10 scale.

On paper, CFCO should be as strong or stronger than any of the Detroit stations, especially during the daytime.

WJR's potency has degraded with time. Years ago, they used to deliver a decent signal to the entire Grand Rapids area (nearly on par with 670, 720, and at the time, 780 from Chicago). These days, reception along the US 131 corridor is garbage and one has to get out by the airport - toward Lansing - to pick up OK reception.

Even in the Lansing area, I'm hearing more noise on 760 than ever before. Granted, I think that has as much or more to do with an increase in "noisemakers" than degradation in WJR's signal. (By comparison, I've not observed any discernible change in 950 or even 1050's strength.)



bmw
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by bmw » Sun Jan 19, 2020 12:25 pm

MW - I had made an extensive bandscan post in here some years back....AH, found the original graphic.

Looks like I did this bandscan in October of 2012. I remember doing it - using a Terk directional tunable antenna and my beastly Grundig Satellit 2400 radio, sometime in the late morning or early afternoon. Here were the results then:

(scale was 0 to 5 with anything less than a 1 being unlistenable but perhaps identifyable)

Image

Might be interesting to do this test again with the same hardware, same time of year, and compare results.

Summarized, the strongest stations then were (doubling to get to same 10-point scale)...

10.0 WIOS 1480
9.0 WLEW 1340
8.0 WMIC 660
8.0 WFDF 910
8.0 WWJ 950
8.0 WNEM 1250
7.0 CFCO 630
7.0 WJR 760
7.0 WSGW 690
6.0 WSNL 600

I guess I forgot how strong of a signal WLEW 1340 generates here. It creates significant adjacent-channel interference with 1330 out of Flint. Looks like my results, re: WWJ vs WJR are in-line with what I had posted here as well.



CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by CK-722 » Sun Jan 19, 2020 1:50 pm

Thanks for posting that bandscan again, bmw.

That zip code centroid or post office must be within 1/2 mile from the WIOS towers to be that strong. Almost within the blanketing contour (1 V/m).


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)

Post by CK-722 » Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:51 pm

Some old and new contours for stations which changed facilities which reach Tawas City. Old vs. new WWJ service area application was too old to be in the FCC online records.

https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Att ... &exhcnum=1

https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Att ... &exhcnum=2

https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Att ... exhcnum=12

https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Att ... &exhcnum=2

Dismissed.

https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS_Att ... &exhcnum=2


Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic