All accepted registrations through December 9 at 7:00p ET have been activated. Thank you! -M.W.

Please note: Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=48619

All user accounts that have been inactive since January 1, 2017 have been expunged. If you are one of these users and wish to submit a new post, please re-register. Thank you.

Do we need a Non-Commerical portion of FM Anymore?

Topics of general interest that just don't fit anywhere else.
User avatar
Ed Joseph
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:27 pm

Re: Do we need a Non-Commerical portion of FM Anymore?

Post by Ed Joseph » Wed Aug 07, 2019 3:22 pm

I have to say... listening to FM is a joke anymore. There is interference on practically every channel. And they want the FCC to do away with adjacent channel protection now.

Edit: the latter only affects TV adjacents, evidently. M$ wants them for rural broadband.


I confirm all my information through a high, white whore's souse!

EdWalker
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 2:51 pm

Re: Do we need a Non-Commerical portion of FM Anymore?

Post by EdWalker » Mon Aug 12, 2019 6:38 pm

AMs on FM translators was a pure economic move that that did nothing to help the state of AM. If anything, it made it less relevant. Why should someone have a license to rebroadcast in the same area what they already have a license to air? It helped a business, nothing more. And totally f'd the FM band to make it hard to listen.

But greed is the American way. So what happens to all these AMs that air the same programming as a translator (aka "low powered FM")???? They exist now because they have to be on the air to support the FM signal.

Look for a petition for rulemaking at some point in the future to allow AMs to turn off their transmitters and just be 250-watt FM stations.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic