Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Whitmer VS Dixon
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
bmw likes these sorts of things… anybody want to guess a result?Mr. Peabody wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 amLet the fun begin!
https://apnews.com/article/2022-primary ... e2ef255963
I’m gonna go Whitmer 53 Dixon 45.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
That seems about right I'd imagine, maybe Whitmer 54 Dixon 44. Something like that.Rate This wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:06 ambmw likes these sorts of things… anybody want to guess a result?Mr. Peabody wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:01 amLet the fun begin!
https://apnews.com/article/2022-primary ... e2ef255963
I’m gonna go Whitmer 53 Dixon 45.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
I will go 50-47% Whitmer. Tudor has a great strategy team, but her biggest liability will be in the debates. Expect her to agree to one or perhaps no debates. The bottomline is that Tudor believes the 2020 election should be overturned.
Great idea for a Whitmer ad: Is Tudor for rent? Then, it lists all of the dark PAC money she has received from each PAC. Always remember that she is Betsy De Vos lite. Follow the money.
Great idea for a Whitmer ad: Is Tudor for rent? Then, it lists all of the dark PAC money she has received from each PAC. Always remember that she is Betsy De Vos lite. Follow the money.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
Maybe Dixon should say just what PAC's did support her. Don't be shy about saying Betty's money helped her get elected. Have Betty introduce her at rallies. How many Michiganders will think "I believe what her PAC's believe".MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:12 amGreat idea for a Whitmer ad: Is Tudor for rent? Then, it lists all of the dark PAC money she has received from each PAC. Always remember that she is Betsy De Vos lite. Follow the money.
Let's be honest. She's going to need a Hail Mary move to pull this off. The standard campaign playbook isn't going to work. Perhaps this is one thing she could do. "Yup, this is who's behind me".
I found it interesting you saying Whitmer should expose Dixon's "Dark PAC's". Have I not read on here a few times that it was Democratic PAC's paying for attack ads against Dixon? Is exposing PAC's a dance Whitmer wants to start? Would Dixon bringing to light ALL the PAC's in the campaign for both her and her opponent be a good thing?
And I'm happy to report everyone and every thing I voted for either won or passed yesterday.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
Whitmer is just another fertilizer salesperson.
Dixon just needs to keeping reminding everyone of that.
Like the 20-cent tax that she laughed off in the debate as untrue...only ask for 45 cents!
Dixon just needs to keeping reminding everyone of that.
Like the 20-cent tax that she laughed off in the debate as untrue...only ask for 45 cents!
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- lidoshuffle
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:58 pm
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
If you voted for "Rashida", you need your head examined and seriously, re-evaluate your choices of you you agree with on politics...In The Bleachers wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:47 amMaybe Dixon should say just what PAC's did support her. Don't be shy about saying Betty's money helped her get elected. Have Betty introduce her at rallies. How many Michiganders will think "I believe what her PAC's believe".MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:12 amGreat idea for a Whitmer ad: Is Tudor for rent? Then, it lists all of the dark PAC money she has received from each PAC. Always remember that she is Betsy De Vos lite. Follow the money.
Let's be honest. She's going to need a Hail Mary move to pull this off. The standard campaign playbook isn't going to work. Perhaps this is one thing she could do. "Yup, this is who's behind me".
I found it interesting you saying Whitmer should expose Dixon's "Dark PAC's". Have I not read on here a few times that it was Democratic PAC's paying for attack ads against Dixon? Is exposing PAC's a dance Whitmer wants to start? Would Dixon bringing to light ALL the PAC's in the campaign for both her and her opponent be a good thing?
And I'm happy to report everyone and every thing I voted for either won or passed yesterday.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
No I'm a little south of her spread.lidoshuffle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 4:22 pmIf you voted for "Rashida", you need your head examined and seriously, re-evaluate your choices of you you agree with on politics...In The Bleachers wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:47 amAnd I'm happy to report everyone and every thing I voted for either won or passed yesterday.
I'm in Dingell Country. Only God is going to take Debbie out of office.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12229
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
Rashida won in a total landslide.
I obviously will be voting for her opponent, Steven Elliott. I also voted for him yesterday.
I obviously will be voting for her opponent, Steven Elliott. I also voted for him yesterday.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
I find it interesting that that pro-Israel groups came out against Levin but left that racist from Dearborn intact.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- audiophile
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
Here's another little gem for Whitmer.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ ... 081060002/
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ ... 081060002/
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
I didn’t realize you lived that far west. I thought the cut off was Southfield Rd.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 5:10 pmRashida won in a total landslide.
I obviously will be voting for her opponent, Steven Elliott. I also voted for him yesterday.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
Dixon has an uphill battle, but let's keep in mind, even though she has lots of money, Gretchen Whitmer has been a TERRIBLE governor.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12229
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
MCRF - you're not far off actually; the entire village of Beverly Hills (eastern border is Greenfield) is now in District 12.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
Re: Whitmer VS Dixon
I think Whitmer will win, but it will be closer than 2018. Schuette basically gave up late in that campaign.
My early prediction: Whitmer 52, Dixon 47
My early prediction: Whitmer 52, Dixon 47