Do doctors automatically disappear with the passage of this? GFY.km1125 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:31 pmIt's pretty clear in the language of the proposal:MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 2:47 amWomen don’t have the luxury of waiting. Sorry. And you are 100% wrong.
And you say this protects revenue streams while opponents are running these damn commercials saying unqualified people will be doing abortions. You assholes cannot believe both.
Doesn't say A THING about a doctor or otherwise "qualified medical person"The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an
individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes,
including but not limited to miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state
penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or
assisting a pregnant individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with
their voluntary consent.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Voter referendums approved
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Voter referendums approved
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Voter referendums approved
That could refer to a lot of other things besides sticking coat hanger A into slot B and yanking.km1125 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:31 pmIt's pretty clear in the language of the proposal:MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 2:47 amWomen don’t have the luxury of waiting. Sorry. And you are 100% wrong.
And you say this protects revenue streams while opponents are running these damn commercials saying unqualified people will be doing abortions. You assholes cannot believe both.
Doesn't say A THING about a doctor or otherwise "qualified medical person"The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an
individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes,
including but not limited to miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state
penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or
assisting a pregnant individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with
their voluntary consent.
Re: Voter referendums approved
The don't disappear, but they're no longer REQUIRED to be used to perform these actions, if there can't be any prosecution for any non-doctor or qualified medical person for these procedures. It is very clear in that wording.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 7:33 pmDo doctors automatically disappear with the passage of this? GFY.km1125 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:31 pmIt's pretty clear in the language of the proposal:MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 2:47 amWomen don’t have the luxury of waiting. Sorry. And you are 100% wrong.
And you say this protects revenue streams while opponents are running these damn commercials saying unqualified people will be doing abortions. You assholes cannot believe both.
Doesn't say A THING about a doctor or otherwise "qualified medical person"The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an
individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes,
including but not limited to miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state
penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or
assisting a pregnant individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with
their voluntary consent.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Voter referendums approved
You don’t get it. What woman isn’t going to want care from a doctor at Planned Parenthood or another experienced doctor and instead favor Rick’s Abortion Chop Shop?km1125 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:45 amThe don't disappear, but they're no longer REQUIRED to be used to perform these actions, if there can't be any prosecution for any non-doctor or qualified medical person for these procedures. It is very clear in that wording.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 7:33 pmDo doctors automatically disappear with the passage of this? GFY.km1125 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:31 pmIt's pretty clear in the language of the proposal:MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 2:47 amWomen don’t have the luxury of waiting. Sorry. And you are 100% wrong.
And you say this protects revenue streams while opponents are running these damn commercials saying unqualified people will be doing abortions. You assholes cannot believe both.
Doesn't say A THING about a doctor or otherwise "qualified medical person"The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an
individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes,
including but not limited to miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state
penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or
assisting a pregnant individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with
their voluntary consent.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Voter referendums approved
"You assholes cannot believe both."
Hey Ahole, I don't believe a whole lot of the crap I read on here, but I did read the f&*king proposal.
I'm not going into the abortion/anti-abortion fight.
I'm looking at who came up with this mess, and what their motives are.
There is NO government inspections of the facilities, there is no doctor listed as required, the industry will self-police.
They are released from any responsibilities.
Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse.
This thing is a H*** POS as it sits, it needs fixing.
Hey Ahole, I don't believe a whole lot of the crap I read on here, but I did read the f&*king proposal.
I'm not going into the abortion/anti-abortion fight.
I'm looking at who came up with this mess, and what their motives are.
There is NO government inspections of the facilities, there is no doctor listed as required, the industry will self-police.
They are released from any responsibilities.
Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse.
This thing is a H*** POS as it sits, it needs fixing.
You're never too old to learn something stupid.
Re: Voter referendums approved
At the rate the Democrats are getting energized it’ll easily pass for better or worse.HD74 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:34 pm"You assholes cannot believe both."
Hey Ahole, I don't believe a whole lot of the crap I read on here, but I did read the f&*king proposal.
I'm not going into the abortion/anti-abortion fight.
I'm looking at who came up with this mess, and what their motives are.
There is NO government inspections of the facilities, there is no doctor listed as required, the industry will self-police.
They are released from any responsibilities.
Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse.
This thing is a H*** POS as it sits, it needs fixing.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12229
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Voter referendums approved
A new poll (see Freep for details) shows 59 percent strong support for the proposal and an additional 5 percent in likely support.
Even 40 percent of self-identified Republicans said they would vote or are likely to vote "yes.". That number jumps to 64 percent for indies and 88 percent for Democrats.
Even 40 percent of self-identified Republicans said they would vote or are likely to vote "yes.". That number jumps to 64 percent for indies and 88 percent for Democrats.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
Re: Voter referendums approved
You've never really paid too close attention to how things get done in the business world. The chemical industry is effectively self-regulating. The agriculture business is essentially self-regulating. Since corporations became people all kinds of goofy things are happening and I'm sorry you're just becoming aware of it.HD74 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:34 pm"You assholes cannot believe both."
Hey Ahole, I don't believe a whole lot of the crap I read on here, but I did read the f&*king proposal.
I'm not going into the abortion/anti-abortion fight.
I'm looking at who came up with this mess, and what their motives are.
There is NO government inspections of the facilities, there is no doctor listed as required, the industry will self-police.
They are released from any responsibilities.
Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse.
This thing is a H*** POS as it sits, it needs fixing.
However, I agree with this tactic because you have some activist Republicans who will try to create any roadblock possible to prevent the access to safe abortions. They don't seem to really have much respect for the way laws are created so these kind of tactics need to be employed so they can't come up with an arbitrary way to Hinder women's rights.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Voter referendums approved
Just wonder how "safe" the abortion is for that baby!!
Re: Voter referendums approved
That discussion is useless. We will never agree, and I am on the side of science and the voting majority.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Voter referendums approved
What a pathetic attempt at an insult, go back and try again.
You're never too old to learn something stupid.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Voter referendums approved
I find it absurd to think woman are suddenly not going to want to go to Planned Parenthood and would choose back alley abortions as the pro birth are saying. Why would they not go to their OBGYN and why would Planned Parenthood fire all their doctors? The commercials are so pathetic.TC Talks wrote: ↑Thu Sep 22, 2022 10:46 amYou've never really paid too close attention to how things get done in the business world. The chemical industry is effectively self-regulating. The agriculture business is essentially self-regulating. Since corporations became people all kinds of goofy things are happening and I'm sorry you're just becoming aware of it.HD74 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:34 pm"You assholes cannot believe both."
Hey Ahole, I don't believe a whole lot of the crap I read on here, but I did read the f&*king proposal.
I'm not going into the abortion/anti-abortion fight.
I'm looking at who came up with this mess, and what their motives are.
There is NO government inspections of the facilities, there is no doctor listed as required, the industry will self-police.
They are released from any responsibilities.
Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse.
This thing is a H*** POS as it sits, it needs fixing.
However, I agree with this tactic because you have some activist Republicans who will try to create any roadblock possible to prevent the access to safe abortions. They don't seem to really have much respect for the way laws are created so these kind of tactics need to be employed so they can't come up with an arbitrary way to Hinder women's rights.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.